Published
5 years agoon
By
gvwireI am a new reader of GV Wire, so it was with great interest that I turned to your Voter Guide. I was quite shocked to see the content of the “No” commentary on Measure P.
First, the opponents of Measure P are not giving Fresno residents much credit: They assume their motivations are based primarily on dollars and cents. Do they really think Fresno residents will leave town to buy a $1,200 washing machine because it saves them $4.50 on the purchase price? Would residents really prefer saving a few dollars over supporting clean parks, after-school programs, improved air quality, and increased livability for the entire community in which they live?
Second, a public safety measure having priority over Measure P is a moot point: There isn’t one competing with Measure P in this election!
If a public safety measure makes it on the ballot in 2020, the good citizens of Fresno can take stock of the situation at that time and vote accordingly. And besides, it’s not an either or proposition: Both parks and public safety are important approaches to reducing crime and increasing livability.
I would be willing to wager that if Measure P passes, it will make important progress toward addressing the desperation and hopelessness found in some of our more crime-prone neighborhoods.
Many of our parks are in such states of disrepair that they are magnets for crime. Cleaning up our parks and providing after-school programs could turn this situation around, giving young people recreational outlets they don’t currently have. With more residents drawn to well-maintained parks, with programs providing healthy alternatives, and with rangers to patrol, Measure P is on track to improve public safety!
Lastly, the dark warning that Measure P creates an unelected commission to make spending recommendations seems disingenuous. The mayor, who is an opponent of Measure P, would get to select the members of this commission, so he can hardly complain that they might be unfit to do the job.
Many elected officials are incompetent to do their jobs, and many appointees are perfectly capable of doing theirs. Careful selection and vetting are key, whether one is elected or appointed.
So, opponents should think twice: This measure is about generosity of spirit, civic-mindedness, forward thinking, and making Fresno everything it could be — rather than consistently finding it at the bottom on so many rankings of cities its size.
Step up, Fresno: Vote ‘Yes’ on Measure P!
Dr. Kirsten Honeyman is a clinical psychologist and member of Tree Fresno.
Fresno Supervisors Send $720 Million Tax Hike Question to November Ballot
Fresno Parks ‘Still Look Like Crap’ Despite Measure P: Soria
Fat Fresno Budget Could Make Most Everyone’s Park Dreams Come True
Fresno Commission Explores Hiring Consultant to Hire Consultant
Measure P Tax Increases Start July 1. Are Retailers Concerned?
79% of Tulare County Newsom Recall Signatures Are Valid