Opinion

California Housing Policy Takes Two Steps Forward and One Back

Published

3 weeks ago

September 11, 2023

California's housing policy suffered a setback in the recent settlement of a lawsuit against a Southern California city, says Dan Walters. (Photo by Pablo Unzueta for CalMatters)

Share with friends

The final days of the 2023 legislative session are producing new pro-housing laws that close legal loopholes often used to block or delay projects.

Dan Walters

CalMatters

Opinion

On one day last week, the Legislature sent two major pro-housing bills to Gov. Gavin Newsom.

One, Assembly Bill 1307, aims to overcome a truly bizarre appellate court ruling that a long-pending University of California student housing project in the famous People’s Park site in Berkeley could be stalled if UC didn’t mitigate the noise that students would make. Newsom signed the bill late last week.

The court said that failing to consider the potential noise impacts from loud student parties in neighborhoods near campus in the was “a longstanding problem that the EIR improperly dismissed as speculative.” Its ruling, in effect, handed anti-housing interests a powerful new way to misuse the California Environmental Quality Act.

The second measure, Assembly Bill 1114, would close an anti-housing loophole unique to San Francisco. City law allows an extra bite of the apple to project opponents, giving them the right to challenge building permits even after developments have cleared all other political and legal hurdles.

The poster child for the ploy was a 90-unit affordable housing project at 2550 Irving Street which was delayed by an additional 2 1/2 years, raising costs by $1 million. AB 1114 essentially bans post-entitlement challenges to building permits, thus reinforcing the concept that at some point there has to be finality in red tape that projects must endure.

Now for other side of the coin.

A week before the two bills were sent to Newsom, he and Attorney General Rob Bonta announced what appeared, superficially, to be another housing victory — settling a lawsuit against the City of San Bernardino for dragging its feet on revising city housing laws to be more accommodating.

Important Settlement Appears Flawed

It was an important case because once-thriving San Bernardino has fallen on hard times in recent years, clobbered by poverty, crime and urban decay. It even filed for bankruptcy a few years ago and needs all the housing it can get to climb out of its civic hole.

State law requires city’s to enact pro-housing rules, known as the “housing element,” to meet quotas set by state and regional officials for making land available for development.

“Our state’s housing element law is in place to ensure that all cities build their fair share of housing. No city is spared from that legal obligation. It is not a choice. It is the law,” Bonta said in a joint statement with Newsom. “Cities that fail to follow the law and plan for their fair share of housing will be held accountable,” Newsom added. “The status quo will not be tolerated.”

It would appear that the action embraces the consistency that state oversight should stress. However, California’s leading authority on housing law, UC-Davis Law School Professor Chris Elmendorf, disagrees. In a lengthy analysis of the settlement he posted on X (formerly Twitter), Elmendorf argues that Bonta went beyond the law and imposed conditions on San Bernardino that could backfire.

Elmendorf is especially critical of one provision that would, in effect, block the city from approving any housing project if it falls short of embracing the settlement’s provisions.

“This is nuts,” he said. “In the name of solving the housing crisis, @AGRobBonta is signing onto a plan that, if there’s a foot-fault, will block the city from approving market-rate housing anywhere in town.”

The settlement thus introduces a whole new set of conditions that other cities must now parse, generating uncertainty that undermines consistency. The net result for that week was two steps forward and one step back.

About the Author

Dan Walters has been a journalist for nearly 60 years, spending all but a few of those years working for California newspapers. He began his professional career in 1960, at age 16, at the Humboldt Times. CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more columns by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.

Make Your Voice Heard

GV Wire encourages vigorous debate from people and organizations on local, state, and national issues. Submit your op-ed to rreed@gvwire.com for consideration.

GV Wire – Explore. Explain. Expose

California Housing Policy Takes Two Steps Forward and One Back

About the Author

You may like

Everything You Need to Know About This Year’s Big Fresno Fair

Rangers, Twins, Diamondbacks and Phillies Look to Advance Today in Playoffs

Acting Speaker McHenry Orders Pelosi to Vacate Capitol Hideaway Office

Biden to Erase $9 Billion More in Student Debt for 125,000 Borrowers

Today’s Planned Nationwide Emergency Alert Blast Sparks Conspiracy Claims

Russia Says It Has Foiled a Major Ukraine Drone Attack as Concerns Grow Over Kyiv’s Weapons Supplies

Kaiser Workers Go on Strike Over Wages and Staff Shortages

Arizona to End Saudi-Owned Firm’s ‘Unlimited’ Access to State’s Groundwater

California’s Unemployment Fund is Underwater and It’s a Huge Embarrassment

SF Giants Start Search for Manager With Internal Candidates

Which Republicans Teamed With Dems to Oust Bakersfield’s Kevin McCarthy as Speaker?

CA Celebrates Water-Filled Reservoirs With a Wary Eye on El Niño

California’s Unemployment Fund is Underwater and It’s a Huge Embarrassment

Did Newsom Dig a New Hole With Appointment of Senate Replacement for Feinstein?

Dianne Feinstein Always Did Things Her Way in Long Political Career

Technology and Labor Trade-Offs Create Dilemma for California’s Economy

Lawmakers Resolve California Fast Food Battle but Clash Still Rages in Another Industry

California’s Politicians Point Fingers as Public Tolerance of Homelessness Wears Thin

Has California’s Much-Dreaded ‘Job Killer’ List Lost Some of Its Bite?

Newsom Decision on Big Gun and Ammo Tax Hike May Rest With ‘Canoe Theory’

Newsom Burnishes His National Image by Waging New Attack on Oil Industry

California Legislators Whiff on ‘Spiraling Crisis’ in Home Insurance Market

California Unions Scored Big in Legislature This Year, Though They Represent Few

Compromise Settles Dispute Over Status of Franchises in Fast Food Industry

Clovis Unified Superintendent Discusses Expansion at State of the District

The Huge Battle Against Food Deserts in Fresno

GV Wire’s Nancy Price Answers Kim Stephens’ Questions About Controversial PBS Story

LA Purse Snatcher Drags Woman, 75, Across Asphalt Before Fleeing

DeSantis Stops in Fresno for Private Presidential Fundraiser

Teamwork, Hard Work is Key to Clovis Unified’s Continued Success, Folmer Says at Annual Fundraiser

New Police, Fire Tax? Council Wants One More Week to Decide How to Pay for Fresno Growth

These Four Groups Control the California Legislature: Dan Walters

Trump Leads Biden by 9 Points in Latest ABC/Washington Post Poll

This World Renowned Art Icon Crafts His Masterpieces in Fresno

News Minute: Regulators Delay Solar Ruling; Unleashing California’s Economy; Amazon’s Local Hiring Spree

New 24/7 Fresno Gym Was Made For Those Who Don’t Stop